Skip to main content

I've finally done it

I've been avoiding it, really. Blogs are a big enough time-suck on my life that I'm pretty sure this is a bad idea. But the voice of temptation in the back of my head keeps suggesting that maybe having my own blog will prove a boon rather than bane. Maybe I'll spout off here instead off all over cyberdom, saving time and energy. Do you think? The feeling of speaking aloud in an empty room is almost eerie.

The biggest reason in favor of my having a blog is also the biggest reason against it. I'm a writer. I hope to be famous some day. (Or at least paid.) Web pages and blogs can be a great tool for a writer for connecting to her audience, or potential audience. It can also be a fabulous way to alienate her audience. I intend to try to have my cake and eat it too. I know I'm not going to be able to keep my big mouth shut, so for this blog I'm Synova. Oh, I don't care if everyone knows that my name is Julie Pascal. That's not it at all. But hopefully it will be easier for people who like Synova to find Julie and less easy for people who like Julie (once I get a static website up) to find Synova.

Yes, I know that anyone can find anything... I'm talking about the level of ease involved. It's one thing to hope your potential audience can forgive your politics and quite another to rub their faces in it.

Because I know, even when I try to make it not matter, that it ruins my enjoyment of someone's books or singing or acting if I find it too difficult to pretend that I don't know how much of an idiot they are. But I do try to pretend and I'm going to count on the fact that other people are a bit like me.

So what do I expect to put on this site? At a "start your blog now" seminar I recently attended the lady giving the talk recommended keeping any blog narrowly focused. She had lots of excellent reasons for giving that advice. I'm going to ignore all of them. I'm going to talk about what I feel like talking about. I don't have the self-dicipline to avoid politics. I'll definately talk about science fiction and what I'm writing at any given time. Maybe I'll post bits I'm working on. I'd like to do some reviewing, plugging authors I think deserve more attention. (I'm not going to give negative reviews. If I can't say something good I'd rather say nothing at all.) I'm also interested in gardening and a little bit interested in cooking. I may occasionally mention homeschooling or what my kids are doing or my Christian faith.

If anyone cares, I have a long usenet history. My newsgroups have been mostly misc.education.home-school.christian and rec.arts.sf.composition. I emphatically recommend both of them. The homeschool group is a bit of a rough playground sometimes, but I like it that way. Rec.arts.sf.composition is an incredible resource. My only advice for a new visitor there is that they're going to require you to put qualifications on your statements... I think, only my opinion... that sort of thing.

I've got quite a few blogs bookmarked. Most of my posting lately has been on Vodkapundit (as Julie,) Blackfive and GayPatriot. Real soon now I'll figure out how to link them. Yes, I know blogger makes it so easy a monkey could do it, but you have to figure I even screwed up their "create your blog" process. I'm *talented*.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...

How Suzanne Brockman lost me.

I just finished reading the latest paperback from Suzanne Brockmann. _Dark of Night_. I'm disappointed and that's a sad thing because I've absolutely loved her series of romances about SEAL team 16 and the Troubleshooters. Aparently I'm not alone. My complaint isn't the same as most of the others... I'm great with Sophia and Dave. I even am okay with Tracey being people smart. She and Decker did seem to come out of left field. I thought Decker was great even if I thought his overwhelming conflict was pretty lame. What I didn't care for was the politics. I read for escapism, for studly dangerous men acting like men, for sex, and adventure with guns, where our military are the good guys and the SEALs are supermen and military contractor's are heroes, too. (I wonder if Ms. Brockmann realizes that the Troubleshooters ARE Blackwater?) I do not read sexy action adventure to be presented with a *cause*. It's small things but they don...

The Intersectionalist High Church

           It seems to me that the "conversation" about Black Lives that is focused on intersectionality is focused on doctrine to the exclusion of life itself; the exclusion of physical, actionable life itself. Rather than focus on how people live or even what they think and feel, the focus is on confession, language, and conversion to a doctrine.            Someone asked if what was going on was a religion.            Not only is it a religion but it can't even really be discussed without using religious  terms.            There's a Church, now, more concerned with exclusivity than with reform. More concerned with an Inquisition than with reform. It's not that some people are going to do it all wrong, are going to address Black Lives wrong, but that anyone outside of the Fellowship can not be ALLOWED to address problems which nearly everyone, to a person...