Skip to main content

The company he keeps....

So.

I'm watching the second season of Highlander, an episode creatively titled "Warmonger", and the reporter who is trying to get the story of an evil immortal who has played the power behind the throne, tosses off this explanation of why she is taking the opportunity to interview this very dangerous man: "Stalin is dead. Mao is dead. And Saddam Hussein hasn't been giving interviews lately."

That's from memory so I'm sure it's not exact, but close enough.

I just thought it was interesting that in 1994-ish Saddam Hussein rated an offhand popular cultural reference that paired him, as the then living member, of a very elite company.

George Bush decides to do something about it ten years later and suddenly Saddam is just another guy, no worse than anyone else.

Comments

Trooper York said…
I read today that you said you write science fiction. Is any of it published? I remember you talking about Baen in one thread and wonder if you have any stuff out. I would love to read it as I am a big science fiction buff.
Synova said…
Oh, gosh.

No, nothing published, nothing novel length finished. I have sent short stories out in the past to magazines and been rejected, so I can claim that bit of follow-through and legitimacy.

For a lot of years I wouldn't have named myself a writer... I mean, everyone is, right? And everyone sucks. So announcing that you're a writer when you don't have anything published to point at sort of feels like an announcement that one is a poseur. But I realized a while ago that if I didn't think of myself that way, as a writer, then I'd never do it.

I do write. And what I write is usually science fiction.

I like Baen and what seems to be the publishing philosophy there. I participate on a usenet group, rec.arts.sf.composition, and for many years there was a lot of disdain expressed for Baen... until increasingly more long time newsgroup participants were published by Baen rather than someone else. It's hard to bad-mouth the publisher who bought the book of the fellow you're talking to.

I think that for many years science fiction was having a crisis of relevance. The general thought was that science fiction needed to be elevated from pulp to literature. Lately, however, I think there has been a shift back to an appreciation of adventure and story, to give the pure energy and vitality of the genre its due.

Popular posts from this blog

Some times some people.

 

It's Not Projection

Take the case of "fascism". When you can see clear as day that the person who is accusing you of fascism is a fascist, they aren't projecting. They're talking about something ELSE. Basically, in the case of fascism, the basic set of fascist government controls are the default assumption of reality for a whole lot of people. The government is supposed to control every part of your life. The government is supposed to make you moral and good and reflect "justice". The government is supposed to do this by picking winners from the good people and losers from the bad people. The government is supposed to control the way people do business, how businesses (and farmers) function and what they produce. And people should be made to cooperate with this control because they are part of society and society is dependent on everyone being in compliance. This is simply the Truth. It's how the world works and how the world is supposed to work. The Socialist Nationalism, ...

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...