Skip to main content

Mars: First, a Pascal Dome

I'd probably have to write a best selling series about colonizing Mars in order to get anyone to call it a Pascal Dome, but whatever... we've got Dyson Spheres and O'Neill Colonies, why not a Pascal Dome?

The idea is simple...
 1. Send a robot probe or two out to find a BIG ice rock, either in singles or a cluster, boost the ice to Mars.

 2. Crash it into the planet making a nice new deep crater that is, coincidentally, got that big chunk of ice water in the middle of it.  

 3. Cover the crater with a dome or even a air tight fabric cover before the volatiles are lost.

This reservoir of (mostly) water then supports an initial colonial development cluster; A town.  Housing, agriculture, life support and manufacturing is built around the contained crater.

Over time, possibly over decades...
 1. The pressure and air quality under the dome is adjusted to something that is human breathable.
 2. The temperature can be adjusted within the dome to something comfortable.
 3. At some point lights can be added sufficient to grow orchards.

But at first, the purpose is simply resources.

The end result, however, is a Town Green. There is now a park in the center of a development where people can go for a picnic or just to have a little bit of space instead of walls.  I think that humans can do well in tight spaces, in extremely small spaces.  But not without relief, not without somewhere to go that has some space. Several ice rock craters in a cluster is a series of parks in a city.

Hey, sounds great for the first bunch of ice rocks dropped, right?  What about later, when there are other settlements to drop rocks on top of?  Aiming shouldn't be that hard, if we can send robot landers that land where we want them to land.  And new colonies can purchase bonds in case of accidents.

Mars has water, so what's the point?  Yes, Mars does have water, but it's going to be hard enough to get, along with all the other gasses and whatnot to fuel life support and hydroponics, that the boost at the beginning is a good idea.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...

How Suzanne Brockman lost me.

I just finished reading the latest paperback from Suzanne Brockmann. _Dark of Night_. I'm disappointed and that's a sad thing because I've absolutely loved her series of romances about SEAL team 16 and the Troubleshooters. Aparently I'm not alone. My complaint isn't the same as most of the others... I'm great with Sophia and Dave. I even am okay with Tracey being people smart. She and Decker did seem to come out of left field. I thought Decker was great even if I thought his overwhelming conflict was pretty lame. What I didn't care for was the politics. I read for escapism, for studly dangerous men acting like men, for sex, and adventure with guns, where our military are the good guys and the SEALs are supermen and military contractor's are heroes, too. (I wonder if Ms. Brockmann realizes that the Troubleshooters ARE Blackwater?) I do not read sexy action adventure to be presented with a *cause*. It's small things but they don...

How "Representation" In Fiction Becomes Toxic

  Some things sound so obviously good that they don't need to be examined.  One of those things is the idea of Representation in fiction; movies, television or books.  Entertainment where some people are conspicuously absent would seem to be an obvious problem, right?  A person doesn't have to be "woke" or any sort of feminist to occasionally watch an old television show and realize (for example) that all the scientists and astronauts in an old movie are men. It's as glaring an anachronism these days as watching a show where everyone is chain smoking cigarettes. Entertainment should reflect the diverse nature of real life and society because, in the end, fiction has to be even more real than real life.  If nothing else, it makes that entertainment more interesting to introduce characters with a variety of backgrounds and challenges. And so we're told that diverse fiction is BETTER fiction. The way that this rather obvious truth is often framed, often discussed...