Skip to main content

My Second Amendment Rights




Comments

KCFleming said…
Double plus good!!
Lem Vibe Bandit said…
Good for you Synova.
cf said…
Shoot! (um, I guess that should be "Darn!") I am late to the party. I better get movin on this myself. congratulations :^)
virgil xenophon said…
Now start laying in "mass quantities" of ammo before the Obammasiah and/or his minions at the local and/or State level tax it out of reach--plus a good home defense shotgun and a smaller "carry" "parking-lot" gun (what you need to get you safely to your car late at night coming out of the concert/theater Some are as small as 31/2 inches and will take .22 magnum cartridges--enough to blow the guy's throat out at close range)
Big Mike said…
I hate to say it, but it looks to me as though the grip is a little wide for your hand. Were you able to borrow a PPQ and check it on the range?

Is that the 9mm version or the .40?

I hope you get a laser site for the Picatinny rail under the barrel. That would turn it from "awesome" into "truly awesome."
Big Mike said…
Oops. You did say it was a 9mm, didn't you.
Blast away in good health.
Synova said…
Big Mike, I changed to the small back strap. It's got the medium one in the picture.

To be honest, the small one isn't that much smaller. I might change it back again to see if the shape of the medium back strap makes it more comfortable to hold higher on the grip.

My hands are just freakishly small.
Synova said…
And thanks everyone for checking out the picture. I wanted to show it off a little bit. Not everyone "gets" Oh, wow, look, I got a gun!
Big Mike said…
My own hands are really big, so I have the opposite problem with some handguns having a grip that's uncomfortably small (it's Hell for me buying gloves, too). If you have someone teach you the Weaver grip (don't bother with YouTube videos, pay a real instructor) that will help alleviate things. The isosceles is also a good two-hand grip, but it squares up your body towards your target, which is sort of suboptimal if your target is shooting at you.

Popular posts from this blog

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...

Don't Look Down by Crusie and Mayer

Not really a review, just wanted to say that I enjoyed this book, _Don't Look Down_ by Jennifer Crusie and Bob Mayer. I went to Amazon to get the link and noticed that it's getting trashed in the reviews by people who have been fans of Crusie's romance novels. I can see why they were upset but I hope she continues to collaborate with Mayer because all I can say is "your loss is my gain." I'm also going to be looking for Mayer's books written as Robert Doherty to check them out. _Don't Look Down_ is a silly novel that had me laughing or trying not to let the kids see I was crying... The laughs weren't belly laughs and the tears weren't heart wrenching sobs... It was just fun. And it *was* a romance. With guns. And knives. And Wonder Woman action figures with matching "wonder wear" underwear. And the items the international terrorist was shipping to the Russian mob boss? Pre-colombian jade penises. At least two people get e...

How "Representation" In Fiction Becomes Toxic

  Some things sound so obviously good that they don't need to be examined.  One of those things is the idea of Representation in fiction; movies, television or books.  Entertainment where some people are conspicuously absent would seem to be an obvious problem, right?  A person doesn't have to be "woke" or any sort of feminist to occasionally watch an old television show and realize (for example) that all the scientists and astronauts in an old movie are men. It's as glaring an anachronism these days as watching a show where everyone is chain smoking cigarettes. Entertainment should reflect the diverse nature of real life and society because, in the end, fiction has to be even more real than real life.  If nothing else, it makes that entertainment more interesting to introduce characters with a variety of backgrounds and challenges. And so we're told that diverse fiction is BETTER fiction. The way that this rather obvious truth is often framed, often discussed...