Skip to main content

The Mary Sue: A Case Study

I previously posted this to Facebook.


If you are watching Teen Wolf because I talked about it, don't read this because spoilers. Not awful ones, but I know it wrecks stuff if I'm anticipating something happening. Knocks me out of the story.
Anyhow, I want to talk about the character, Kira. At first she works. And then, in my opinion, she stops working. And she stops working because she's a Mary Sue. Sort of a fake, artificial, logical Mary Sue but the effect ends up being the same. Which I find interesting and possibly important from a writing point of view.
If you've watched, staring in season 3, the character of Kira is introduced. Kira is a kitsune or she's possessed by a kitsune. As it gains power she loses control of it. But in the mean time it confers to her the ability to be a bad-ass sword fighter. She can control electricity as well, but doesn't do anything with it.
Compared to Allyson who's back story is that starting as a very young girl she practiced with a bow and arrow and was proficient enough to be on the National Junior team. Her family also taught her other weapons. Even if they never told her the Big Family Secret, she was trained.
Kira wasn't. And while at first she does a few things that could be instinct or accident, as events progress she simply allows the spirit in her to do all the work. They continue this logically and eventually she has to leave and spend indefinite decades or centuries learning not to be subservient to it. So ultimately it was a recognized thing, that she hadn't earned or learned any of her skills, and in the story it all flows logically and purposefully.
But something else happened, too. She lost agency. Losing agency is not interesting. Fighting to regain and assert agency would be interesting but she doesn't do that. And not being compulsively inquisitive toward her own *self* was not interesting.
It doesn't need to be one of those sequences where the new superhero kid tests to see what his superpowers are, how fast he can run or how high he can jump, but if you could turn on a light bulb, wouldn't you try to see what else you could do?
But the lessons for *story* are still there.
There's a reason that a Mary Sue character doesn't work. And it doesn't work even when it makes sense because the same problems exist. People don't complain when they *expect* a Mary Sue because they don't like a super powered girl character. They complain because they know that this particular failure will ruin a story

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Some times some people.

 

It's Not Projection

Take the case of "fascism". When you can see clear as day that the person who is accusing you of fascism is a fascist, they aren't projecting. They're talking about something ELSE. Basically, in the case of fascism, the basic set of fascist government controls are the default assumption of reality for a whole lot of people. The government is supposed to control every part of your life. The government is supposed to make you moral and good and reflect "justice". The government is supposed to do this by picking winners from the good people and losers from the bad people. The government is supposed to control the way people do business, how businesses (and farmers) function and what they produce. And people should be made to cooperate with this control because they are part of society and society is dependent on everyone being in compliance. This is simply the Truth. It's how the world works and how the world is supposed to work. The Socialist Nationalism, ...

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...