Skip to main content

What You Know That Isn't So

 



The saying goes like this, It's not what you *don't* know that is going to trip you up, it's what you know that isn't so.

I believe that the first lady might possibly have been feigning helplessness, just a little bit.  She already had concept art and visuals, so I think she'll be okay.  

But someone might truly be so new that they know nothing about science fiction as a genre or how it works in the world.  That person, the truly "new" person, might not realize that the second lady, no matter how assured she seems to be that she's passing on vital Wisdom, is wrong.

So lets unwrap her backpack a little (to steal a metaphor).

Stories about space pirates are Space Opera, generally.  "Soft" science in science fiction usually refers to sociology or psychology, social "science".  A story about space pirates might be "soft".  But that's picking nits.  The first big boo-boo is this: "not as popular *because* it is women and enby (???) dominated."   NO!  No, no, no, no, no.  Firstly, Space Opera is not less popular than "hard" science fiction.  And being woman dominated describes the whole of the traditional parts of the science fiction genre today, and rife with "representation" in the past.

The Grand Masters of science fiction, hard, soft, in-between, and of Space Opera are Giantesses such as Bujold and Willis and LeGuin and Leigh Breckett and Asaro and Cherryh and Norton and Butler and...

But what is it with the message that only the less popular science fiction sub-genres have women in them?  The message is that someone out there is out to keep you down.  That is a damaging and destructive message.  And to say that *standard* sci-fi is men dominated so you're going to get push-back? No, no you won't!  Not even if the male domination is true.  NORMAL people do not divide into groups like public potties, male and female, and enter into this absurd struggle where men will try to keep you out if you write a Space Pirate Romp.  Or if you're a female physicist and write science fiction with hard edges no one is going to look at you and shriek, "OMG IT'S A VAGINA PERSON".

Oh, wait, I take that back, in traditional publishing the EDITORS might just scream exactly that as they run up and down the hallway telling everyone about their amazing new author they just found.  Because trad-pub is *very* *strange*.

So here's someone, so enthusiastically helpful, explaining that men are out to get you, but after all, what's new?

It's what she knows that isn't so.

Check out this article.  The Women Other Women Don't See.  It's got information on how to find other sources, a couple of published histories of women in science fiction.  If there's someone trying to keep you down, it's those who warn you about opposition that exists only in their own heads.

Comments

Anonymous said…
I think "enby" is supposed to be N.B., as in non-binary (instead of "nota bene.") Now, just what non-binary is supposed to mean seems to vary so much by the day that your guess is as good, if not better than, mine.

Kris Rusch's anthology of early women sci-fi writers is a great resource for people interested in the topic, especially the official introduction.

TXRed

Popular posts from this blog

Some times some people.

 

It's Not Projection

Take the case of "fascism". When you can see clear as day that the person who is accusing you of fascism is a fascist, they aren't projecting. They're talking about something ELSE. Basically, in the case of fascism, the basic set of fascist government controls are the default assumption of reality for a whole lot of people. The government is supposed to control every part of your life. The government is supposed to make you moral and good and reflect "justice". The government is supposed to do this by picking winners from the good people and losers from the bad people. The government is supposed to control the way people do business, how businesses (and farmers) function and what they produce. And people should be made to cooperate with this control because they are part of society and society is dependent on everyone being in compliance. This is simply the Truth. It's how the world works and how the world is supposed to work. The Socialist Nationalism, ...

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...