Skip to main content

Gun Laws - do you know what you know?

 They didn't really talk about Feinstein's bill at all in this piece. Colion Noir is always good, though. So watch it.

My take away is this, and it's made obvious the last couple of days talking to people who ask what is wrong with the House bills.

ALL of this depends on your ignorance of what the current laws are and it's designed that way. The polls that gun control advocates cite are dependent on the people who respond being ignorant of what the current gun laws are. The media deliberately misinforms you about those laws. Gun control advocates depend on you being misinformed.


1) The definition of "assault rifle" is primarily (if not wholly) cosmetic.
2) Magazine capacity is irrelevant for people committing crimes or mass shootings.
3) ALL commercial sales already require a back ground check.
4) Private sales to anyone who you know cannot buy a gun or have reasonable expectations is a sketchy dude are already illegal.
5) All firearms purchased "through the mail" must be delivered to a licensed gun dealer who is required to perform a back ground check.
6) Controlling ammo sales is fascist bullship. Shooting often enough to be proficient and safe with your firearm consumes more ammo than you can imagine so knock it off.
I invite everyone to watch Colion Noir's video and if you're not, to subscribe to his You Tube.





Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Some times some people.

 

Tyranny.gov vs Tyranny.com

Compulsion is Compulsion, no matter who does it.  This is Brilliant Theft is Theft, no matter who does it. Freedom of Association has no room in it for *private* action   that takes that away Freedom of Association. If I have a business and have voluntary associations such that I choose to serve some people and to not serve others, that might make me a jerk and it might lose me business, it might make me smart and it might gain me business, but it's got to be my choice.  If I would normally serve the current disliked minority in my shop except for the fact that if I'm SEEN to serve them by the wrong people I'll have a private campaign against me as those people do everything possible to ruin me by preventing me from doing business physically or by attacking my customers or suppliers, then I am NOT free to make those choices. Does it really make a difference to losing my CHOICE to voluntarily associate if there's a law that says I may not serve "those people" o...

It's Not Projection

Take the case of "fascism". When you can see clear as day that the person who is accusing you of fascism is a fascist, they aren't projecting. They're talking about something ELSE. Basically, in the case of fascism, the basic set of fascist government controls are the default assumption of reality for a whole lot of people. The government is supposed to control every part of your life. The government is supposed to make you moral and good and reflect "justice". The government is supposed to do this by picking winners from the good people and losers from the bad people. The government is supposed to control the way people do business, how businesses (and farmers) function and what they produce. And people should be made to cooperate with this control because they are part of society and society is dependent on everyone being in compliance. This is simply the Truth. It's how the world works and how the world is supposed to work. The Socialist Nationalism, ...