Skip to main content

Fairy Dust

Why does "international community diplomacy" = Fairy Dust?

I believe it is because we've lost sight of the fact that Diplomacy *is* War.

We think it's not war, that it's something different and civilized. When we don't understand that diplomacy isn't making *nice* but that it's a projection of force rather than persuasion... it's no surprise that it is so ineffective.


Ymarsakar said…
Diplomacy is where you try to plant a dagger in the other guy's back without anyone knowing about it, including your left hand.

War is about declaring formal dueling rituals/traditions, and getting it all out in the open for everyone to witness.
Ymarsakar said…
So in this war of ours, we have combined subterfuge/diplomacy/deception/assassination with war.
Ymarsakar said…
I made this analogy before at Neo's page, where I wrote that there are two main kinds of diplomacy as practiced by diplomats and warriors. Specifically, you can negotiate as you would negotiate in an Arab bazaar over the price of your purchase. Essentially you will haggle until you believe you have a good price and the other side believes that they have a good price. This model of diplomacy is believed in by the UN and other fakers and incompetent idiots, as the primary tool by which differences are resolved without violence.

The other school of diplomacy faces negotiation as another kind of warfare, essentially meaning that one person wins and the other person loses. In such a framework, the rules are different than for haggling.
Synova said…
When one is haggling the buyer and the seller both want the same thing... before they start.

The seller wants to sell.

The buyer wants to buy.

The problem with international diplomacy isn't getting people to do what they want to do, it's getting people to NOT do what they want to do.

Popular posts from this blog

Some times some people.


It's Not Projection

Take the case of "fascism". When you can see clear as day that the person who is accusing you of fascism is a fascist, they aren't projecting. They're talking about something ELSE. Basically, in the case of fascism, the basic set of fascist government controls are the default assumption of reality for a whole lot of people. The government is supposed to control every part of your life. The government is supposed to make you moral and good and reflect "justice". The government is supposed to do this by picking winners from the good people and losers from the bad people. The government is supposed to control the way people do business, how businesses (and farmers) function and what they produce. And people should be made to cooperate with this control because they are part of society and society is dependent on everyone being in compliance. This is simply the Truth. It's how the world works and how the world is supposed to work. The Socialist Nationalism,

What You Know That Isn't So

  The saying goes like this, It's not what you *don't* know that is going to trip you up, it's what you know that isn't so. I believe that the first lady might possibly have been feigning helplessness, just a little bit.  She already had concept art and visuals, so I think she'll be okay.   But someone might truly be so new that they know nothing about science fiction as a genre or how it works in the world.  That person, the truly "new" person, might not realize that the second lady, no matter how assured she seems to be that she's passing on vital Wisdom, is wrong. So lets unwrap her backpack a little (to steal a metaphor). Stories about space pirates are Space Opera, generally.  "Soft" science in science fiction usually refers to sociology or psychology, social "science".  A story about space pirates might be "soft".  But that's picking nits.  The first big boo-boo is this: "not as popular *because* it is women