Skip to main content

My Second Amendment Rights




Comments

KCFleming said…
Double plus good!!
cf said…
Shoot! (um, I guess that should be "Darn!") I am late to the party. I better get movin on this myself. congratulations :^)
virgil xenophon said…
Now start laying in "mass quantities" of ammo before the Obammasiah and/or his minions at the local and/or State level tax it out of reach--plus a good home defense shotgun and a smaller "carry" "parking-lot" gun (what you need to get you safely to your car late at night coming out of the concert/theater Some are as small as 31/2 inches and will take .22 magnum cartridges--enough to blow the guy's throat out at close range)
Big Mike said…
I hate to say it, but it looks to me as though the grip is a little wide for your hand. Were you able to borrow a PPQ and check it on the range?

Is that the 9mm version or the .40?

I hope you get a laser site for the Picatinny rail under the barrel. That would turn it from "awesome" into "truly awesome."
Big Mike said…
Oops. You did say it was a 9mm, didn't you.
Blast away in good health.
Synova said…
Big Mike, I changed to the small back strap. It's got the medium one in the picture.

To be honest, the small one isn't that much smaller. I might change it back again to see if the shape of the medium back strap makes it more comfortable to hold higher on the grip.

My hands are just freakishly small.
Synova said…
And thanks everyone for checking out the picture. I wanted to show it off a little bit. Not everyone "gets" Oh, wow, look, I got a gun!
Big Mike said…
My own hands are really big, so I have the opposite problem with some handguns having a grip that's uncomfortably small (it's Hell for me buying gloves, too). If you have someone teach you the Weaver grip (don't bother with YouTube videos, pay a real instructor) that will help alleviate things. The isosceles is also a good two-hand grip, but it squares up your body towards your target, which is sort of suboptimal if your target is shooting at you.

Popular posts from this blog

Some times some people.

 

It's Not Projection

Take the case of "fascism". When you can see clear as day that the person who is accusing you of fascism is a fascist, they aren't projecting. They're talking about something ELSE. Basically, in the case of fascism, the basic set of fascist government controls are the default assumption of reality for a whole lot of people. The government is supposed to control every part of your life. The government is supposed to make you moral and good and reflect "justice". The government is supposed to do this by picking winners from the good people and losers from the bad people. The government is supposed to control the way people do business, how businesses (and farmers) function and what they produce. And people should be made to cooperate with this control because they are part of society and society is dependent on everyone being in compliance. This is simply the Truth. It's how the world works and how the world is supposed to work. The Socialist Nationalism,

What You Know That Isn't So

  The saying goes like this, It's not what you *don't* know that is going to trip you up, it's what you know that isn't so. I believe that the first lady might possibly have been feigning helplessness, just a little bit.  She already had concept art and visuals, so I think she'll be okay.   But someone might truly be so new that they know nothing about science fiction as a genre or how it works in the world.  That person, the truly "new" person, might not realize that the second lady, no matter how assured she seems to be that she's passing on vital Wisdom, is wrong. So lets unwrap her backpack a little (to steal a metaphor). Stories about space pirates are Space Opera, generally.  "Soft" science in science fiction usually refers to sociology or psychology, social "science".  A story about space pirates might be "soft".  But that's picking nits.  The first big boo-boo is this: "not as popular *because* it is women